On Sunday 02 July 2006 11:46 am, Rony wrote: > On Sat, Jul 01, 2006 at 06:23:14PM +0530, Philip Tellis wrote: > > Sometime Today, KG cobbled together some glyphs to say: > > >dunno about semantics - what i call a static site is where all > > > the pages are created before hand, not on the fly > > > > right, and how does that affect whether it was written well or > > not? if the developer who developed the site has some clue, > > he'll write good markup. if he doesn't, he'll make mashed > > potatoes with vangi bath. > > > :) I would rate a site (as a visitor) on its ease of opening up in > : the browser > > and the ease with which a visitor can navigate the site for the > information he/she is looking for.
That is a completely different criteria. UI and graphics layout. Nothing to do with writing html or scriping. Most make the mistake of asking coders to design a website. Or even worse ask graphic layout shops to create websites. -- Rgds JTD -- http://mm.glug-bom.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxers
