On Tuesday 18 July 2006 10:50, jtd wrote: > On Tuesday 18 July 2006 10:50 am, jtd wrote: > > > Same problem with me too ... same solution. > > > Is kde 3.3 faster than 3.5 ? > > > > Dont know. But should be bug fixes. Kde4 according to the grapevine > > is going to be kool. On Suse 10.1 LFY kde3. did not seem to be any > > faster or different. > > Oops that should be On Suse 10.1 LFY kde3.5 .2 did not seem to be any > faster or different. > To use 3.5.3 u would have to switch to sid or etch, which would then > be an incorrect comparison. i think the version shipped with suse is slower
Debian kde 3.3 is snappy but i missed some things i got used to in 3.5 ... like access keys in konqueror .. it didnt work in 3.3 i find that kubuntu 6.06 .. kde is reall snappy. I decided to stick with kubuntu cuz good support, free cds, aptitude, apt!!! nice. suse has got to do something about yast ... its reall slow compared to aptitude. i tried atp4rpm on it ... but was messy. Also suse super (SLICK) is reall fast and its got apt by default ... but on the long run, u get into dependency hell. It uses some packages that are not in the suse dvd. Steven -- http://mm.glug-bom.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxers
