On Wed, 2006-07-19 at 14:18 +0530, Devdas Bhagat wrote: > On 19/07/06 13:02 +0530, Navneet Karnani wrote: > > On 7/19/06, jtd <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > > > >Security u see. U know the terorist are tech savvy. Yay no ordinary > > >people these fellows. So block public communication after the event.. > > > > > Well, actualy, I read one of the news paper articles and it clearly states > > the reason for trying to block the blogs. Blogs, unlike email conversations, > > cannot be traced to the original IP addresses. Hence this step. I am sure > > *REALLY*? I am shocked, I tell you. Shocked! That all these blogging > sites don't maintain webserver logs. And that such logs won't be made > available on request (it does take effort to file for a subpoena for the > information though). > > > the government has hi tech sleuths working on finding a way to track this > > before they open it up again. > > > BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAAHAHAHAAHAHAHAHAHAHA. Where was the joke warning before > this? > > > I also saw the same reasoning being given in blocking voice chats and voip > > calling though non-licensed providers like yahoo, msn, google, skype, etc. > > The licensed providers have to clear some security requirements and hence > > are more traceable. > > > It doesn't matter. Nothing stops the criminals from setting up Asterisk > (or a Cisco call manager) and routing their calls around. > > > Just stating what i read. > > > Learn the technology first. The government is *clueless*. > > Devdas Bhagat >
tut.tut. dvb, easy there. let's not go massacre the poor innnocent for believing everything the newspaper prints :) -gabin -- You can't do anything about the length of your life, but you can do something about its width and depth. -H.L. Mencken
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
-- http://mm.glug-bom.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxers
