--- jtd <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Monday 24 July 2006 10:42 am, jtd wrote: > > Even dna fingerprinting is far from fool proof with a substantial > portion of the population having chimeric genes - genes that do not > belong to either parent. No mommy wasn't having a ball on the > sidelines. And besides that does not explain how dady's and mr. X's > genes both got into knottty baby. >
Ok so what are are claiming? that we are back to square one? or all the steps we took forward werent really forward? And what FOSS options are available that work with handheld or fingerprint scanners? -abhishek __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com -- http://mm.glug-bom.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxers
