--- "Vivek J. Patankar" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 8/25/06, Siddhesh Poyarekar
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On 8/25/06, Vivek J. Patankar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> > > I have recovered files from a dead ext3
> partition (wouldn't mount)
> > > using rlinux. I believe you have already tried
> it. My experience
> > I don't think he's talking about a dead partition.
> He has done an 'rm
> > -rf' which, according to the author of ext3, is
> unrecoverable. I had
> > posted a link earlier on this thread regarding
> this.
>
> Point noted. But if rlinux could recover deleted
> files from a busted
> partition, why can it not do so from a partition
> that's working.
>
A dead partition or a corrupted partition table will
still have intact files in them whereas deleted files
have their property records destroyed thus rendering
them difficult to recover.
For example, if an area map is destroyed, the
individual house records are still available but if
the house records are destroyed, the area map is
blank.
R-Linux works on debugfs that reads file inodes and
their block records but I need a sniffer that can read
pariah blocks and try to patch files from them.
Regards,
Rony.
___________________________________________________________
The all-new Yahoo! Mail goes wherever you go - free your email address from
your Internet provider. http://uk.docs.yahoo.com/nowyoucan.html
--
http://mm.glug-bom.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxers