On Thursday 12 October 2006 03:18, Debarshi 'Rishi' Ray wrote: > >> This is just your assumption, who is asking any one to credit GNU > >> for a non GNU project? The system is indeed GNU system with Linux > >> as a kernel. When the kernel was completed, the only thing you > >> need is to add is the GNU system to make it an OS. And the kernel > >> was also completed using GNU tools. Under such a situation, why > >> do you think we are asking for a thing that we didn't deserve? > > > > Hehehe. Thank you. Exactly what I needed to hear from an FSF > > representative. Now would you be so kind as to make sure everyone > > who tries to spread GNU philosophy is clear upon this point? > > What do you mean? I think you never needed to hear anything from any > FSF representative. You need to tender an apology. Pray do not start > throwing mud around, and then do a 'hehehe'. Get me one GNU hacker > who said Linux is owned by GNU.
No. No apology in this case. I am not simply throwing mud. It is a fact. Hence what I said above.. please make sure that all the GNU fans are clear upon this matter. I was having this argument during RMS' recent lecture. No apology. I apologise when I think I must. Look at the list archives for proof of that. Btw. I never said GNU `hacker'. I said GNU `fans'. -- ---------------------------------------- Mrugesh Karnik GPG Key 0xBA6F1DA8 Public key on http://wwwkeys.pgp.net ----------------------------------------
pgp5kGencP0M2.pgp
Description: PGP signature
-- http://mm.glug-bom.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxers
