On Mon, 2006-12-18 at 11:22 +0530, Dhawal Doshy wrote: > Vihan Pandey wrote: > >> If you fit the requirements and are interested, then send me your > >> profile preferably in plaintext (but .doc and .odt are welcome as well). > > > > > > i find it HIGHLY OFFENSIVE that you are encouraging the use of a .doc file > > format in a GNU/Linux mailing list. Even if your mail is tagged as > > commercial. > > oh no.. i am doomed. So what distro of GNU/Linux do you use?? i am sure > it doesn't bundle OOo. Even if it does, they remove the capability to > read / write .doc files.. right? > > Gimme a break and be practical.. use the right tool for the job and stop > being a GNU/Linux fanboi.. and while you are at it, stop calling it > GNU/Linux as well.. simply 'linux' does the trick. Don't get me wrong, I > love linux.. it gives me and my family lunch, dinner, an occasional > drink and a good life. I am a linux user/admin, not a slave.
Oh, boy! Not only do you not discourage the use of .doc files but you also don't discourage the use of "linux." You really are in for it now. I can sense the thought police gearing up already. i hope you are flame resistant. :) -gabin -- Specifications, design, and coding can be done at any speed - only debugging takes time. -- Weinberg's Programming Principle #6
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
-- http://mm.glug-bom.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxers
