--- Vihan Pandey wrote:
> > > Wikipedia is a good example. They use GNU FDL > license, we didn't ask > > > them to call it GNUpedia. In fact the original > gnupedia project was > > > abandoned in support of wikipedia > > > > not true. it was abandoned because it went phut. > which is what is > > going to happen to hurd also. > > > Only time will tell. If the world needs a a > distributed nano kernel > tomorrow, where else will they look? > How does that matter? At the rate the 'organised' world is destroying the earth's natural wealth (species etc) you think anyone (with enough money to do something) cares about losing the incomplete efforts of thousands of sincere people? Don't forget that the Germans knew how to extract liquid fuel from coal 60 years ago - we wouldn't have such disastrous war and suffering if we had easily available fuel today. What's a better OS compared to that? Vickram Send instant messages to your online friends http://uk.messenger.yahoo.com -- http://mm.glug-bom.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxers
