On Saturday 20 January 2007 11:57, Manoj Srivastava wrote: > On Fri, 19 Jan 2007 17:23:25 +0530, jtd > > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: > > On Friday 19 January 2007 15:41, Harsh Busa wrote: > >> can somebody compare eula from other linux based os vendors ? > > > > The licence says it all. Contrast the above > > with this http://www.debian.org/social_contract#guidelines
> > While I shan't get into the religious jihads of whose > distro is bigger; I am compelled to note that Debian is a > fundamentally different beastie when it comes to freedom issues > (which may or may not be a good thing, depending on your > perspective). Many on the list are not aware of the issues in licensing. Once u are aware do as u please. That apart it peeves me no end that companies like Novell are doing exactly what the gpl wanted to prevent - bottling up knpwledge and creating artifical scarcity. And even worse the people in the foss community actually thinking that somehow this is a good thing. -- Rgds JTD -- http://mm.glug-bom.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxers
