On Mon, 19 Feb 2007 06:38:46 +0530, Kenneth Gonsalves
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> On 18-Feb-07, at 10:18 PM, nipra wrote:
>> Sincere apologies for making offending and personal comments in my
>> posts. Please post your reply. To clear the confusion, I would like
>> to make it clear that Open Source software for me is a software
>> released under a license approved by Open Source Initiative. I
>> don't have any personal interpretation of Open Source software.
> i agree with you there - however I feel that this could be further
> diluted to cover the case of scilab.
What is it that you feel can be diluted? If you are referring
to the definition of OSS, then diluting that definition is not your
call. And until the people who _can_ actually change the definition
do so, scilab is not open source software -- and not free software
either.
manoj
--
God may be subtle, but he isn't plain mean. Albert Einstein
Manoj Srivastava <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <http://www.golden-gryphon.com/>
1024D/BF24424C print 4966 F272 D093 B493 410B 924B 21BA DABB BF24 424C
--
http://mm.glug-bom.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxers
