On 18-Apr-07, at 8:08 PM, ranjeet walunj wrote:
But with the time they have added all the necessary supports and it also satisfies ACID rules. (Tested it with InnoDB Engine)
this is what irritates me. I wish i had kept copies of the old documentation where they were actively campaigning against transactions, views, foreign keys, ACID rules etc. If they had simply said that these were not implemented - fine. I looked at the docs now available for the versions < 3.5 - all that propaganda has been removed! Postgres on the other hand, is frank - if a feature is not there, they say so and have a todo list for it. Not mysql - if they dont have it, it is worthless and unnecessary - when they get it, it is the greatest thing since the mini idli.
-- regards Kenneth Gonsalves Associate, NRC-FOSS [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://nrcfosshelpline.in/web/ -- http://mm.glug-bom.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxers
