continuing with my earlier reply

2007/5/29, Vihan Pandey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
- Ubuntu translations does not respect upstream, they are forks. The
Rosetta translations don't go upstream (It is good in one way since
the quality of the translations are very poor)Again, do you have a web
link that states this?

"However, by studying and taking part in the translation of KDE to
Norwegian I have reached something like a tentative, partial and
temporary "conclusion". That conclusion, to put it very briefly, is
that there is something ... (fishy?) about Launchpad. Now, here is the
story that has led me to this ad hoc and provisional conclusion."

http://charismacode.blogspot.com/2007/01/powers-and-repositories-ubuntu-and.html

It has the details of the experiment he did.

"Rosetta acts and exists as if it is independent of upstream." - again
the same study.


>  So for me gNewSense, Debian, Fedora ... are much more important than
> Ubuntu (but again it is better than Windows, Suse ...).

As a Debian user myself, i would rather give Debian to someone wanting
to to startup with GNU/Linux, however i don't want them to break their
heads on building drivers in their 1st attempt at install. Nor do i
want to restrict them by saying it will work only if you have this
hardware it works else it won't - in fact that gives them the
impression that it is me that is conditioning their freedom :-)

We are almost there to have complete Free Softwares and if we lose
now, why did we do it all along? we could all have sit content with
proprietary software.

> Freedom aspect
> is not the top priority for Ubuntu (Ubuntu website highlights Free of
> Cost availability).

agreed.

That is why I said I cannot recommend ubuntu to anyone.

no, i meant - has anyone asked Canonical why is Launchpad not Free Software ?

There has been discussions on this.

Again from the study:

"Over time, it will be open sourced. Right now we compete with Progeny
and Red Hat and other companies, so we need to have a unique offering
to do so effectively, and that's Launchpad. There are already
libraries and tools in LP that we have open sourced on request,
especially in Rosetta, the translation infrastructure. ..." Mark
Shuttleworth

"... to me, the only logical conclusion to that is that LaunchPad will
be free when Canonical/Ubuntu are the only players in the market, or
when Canonical's current business model fails and they switch to a
different one. Which is fine: if you write some software from scratch,
it's your choice what you do with it; but unless you're an underpants
gnome or a slashdot commenter, the above doesn't qualify as a "plan"
to free LaunchPad." - Anthony Towns, previous debian project leader.


>  Debian uses only Free Software for its infrastructure and it promises
> to give back to the community any new tools created.

agreed.

I believe that is a very important quality for a member in the Free
Software community. If all they do is take everything in and not give
anything back then that is not good for the community.


> see the wiki link. It is not just launchpad, the entire data stored in
> the infrastructure is in proprietary format (Remember the case of
> bitkeeper).

Well, at the end of the day it got dumped for git and if all you say
is true for launchpad it won't last very long either.

is it a prediction?

i would rather give Debian to someone over any other distro ANY day,
only one can't do that all the time. If everyone i met was a techie
and willing to
go the extra mile - yes it works, only life isn't always like that.
The normal non
techie user DOES count.

I'm working on debian to make it easier for new users, so are many.

Sometimes it not so bad if you hold a child's hand while it is
learning to walk :-)

I would love to do it myself rather than depending on someone else.

> You will have to use a non-free program to participate in ubuntu
> development and your contributions will be stored in a proprietary
> format, you could retrieve it only through that program (remember
> bitkeeper).

i do and i also remember how it was chucked out and replaced by git.

Do you know why it was chucked out? the bitkeeper guys said, enough
you can't use it any more. Here the case is different. Both guys are
the same.

Cheers
Praveen
--
പ്രവീണ് അരിമ്പ്രത്തൊടിയില്
Join The DRM Elimination Crew Now!
http://fci.wikia.com/wiki/Anti-DRM-Campaign
-- 
http://mm.glug-bom.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxers

Reply via email to