On 8/21/07, jtd <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Monday 20 August 2007 23:21, Siddhesh Poyarekar wrote: > > On 8/20/07, Dinesh Joshi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > This is insanity sir! :P hehe...web pages can definitely target > > > both eyes and ears ;) ( and more! ). We can play music on web > > > pages ;) > > > > Yes, some ads do, but not even close to being the majority. And > > they're not as effective as TV anyways. > > The problem is with media companies rather than content or ads - > stupid ineffective targeting. So you have "chinese marketing" logic > for delivering content and ads. Result - adblockers. If the website > is loosing money due to adblockers it's a very good thing and a > highily desirable clue bat. Now all u need is an adblocker profiler > that reports back to HQ so thatu can deliver unblocked ads and charge > the moon and save bandwidth by preblocking blocked ads and.....
I think above is a fantastic idea. Somehow the term adblockers carries a negative connotation for advertisers, i guess they need perspectives like these. -- > Rgds > JTD > > -- > http://mm.glug-bom.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxers > -- Puneet -- http://mm.glug-bom.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxers
