On Sat, 8 Sep 2007 12:41:31 +0530, Kenneth Gonsalves <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> On 08-Sep-07, at 12:33 PM, Agnello George wrote:
>> how would one rate the following sendmail postfix qmail exim
> postfix postfix postfix postfix
I happen to still use sendmail. I have long ago paid my dues
with sendmail.cf; and given that sendmail.cf is a Turing complete
language, there are things possible in it that are not possible for
things like postfix. And the restructuring of sendmail has improved it
security stance a lot; and there are a whole lot of eyes looking at
sendmail installations around the world.
Having said that, if you are new to MTA's, and have not yet
mastered the arcanities of sendmail.cf, stick to postfix. It is simpler
to operate, and most people never need the ability to write a fast
fourier transform in sendmail.cfr ;)
manoj
--
Statements by respected authorities which tend to agree with a writer's
viewpoint are always handy. -- Amrom Katz
Manoj Srivastava <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <http://www.golden-gryphon.com/>
1024D/BF24424C print 4966 F272 D093 B493 410B 924B 21BA DABB BF24 424C
--
http://mm.glug-bom.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxers
