On 10/28/07, Abhishek Daga <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Oh come on guys, just call it quits. Vihan, its great to be anal and you > have made your point,
Thank You. Though its a good idea to use the word analytical ;-) > but at this point you are just beating a dead horse. Hmm... i do admit that message by now must have sunk through and in future greater care will be taken to avoid such incidents. > How about this? Why dont you edit the article to EXACTLY how it should have > been with all the right tones and > words thrown in. It may stand as a tutorial for future media interviews. While that sounds like a good idea, that article is copyrighted to rediff and/or the journalist concerned and has not been released under a license such that i can modify and re-publish it. > Why > Why is it that only the most nonsensical discussions gather momentum on the > list? LMAO! Well, i think that's the topic for another thread :D > I'd rather see the stupidest or simplest linux related question answered > (and not with the "do a google first" response) than see a discussion ending > up like this.... Its human nature to expect and hope everything goes perfectly. Ironically it it also human nature to loose sense of that fact at times :-) Regards, - vihan -- http://mm.glug-bom.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxers
