All ths talk of supporting laptops with foss is well and fine, but I
wonder how many of many of us would *actually* buy a laptop just
because it has FOSS installed in it (i know i wont) because most of
these comanies use non MS os just to make cheap laptops even cheaper.
Also if i was going to have just one laptop i would rather pay a bit
more and buy something which i *know* comes with good and reliable
after sales service.

On 2/19/08, Rony <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Nishit Dave wrote:
> >
> > 1.  Lobby local computer makers like HCL and Zenith to offer an option
> > for loading Linux or selling systems without a pre-loaded OS (and with
> > a tiny little discount).  The pre-installed OS can be on a secondary
> > partition, to allow Windows to be installed on a primary partition at
> > the user's option later.  I know, the manufacturers would risk paying
> > the Microsoft Tax (TM) heavily if they tried to do anything like this,
> > but this could at least help bring an unfair practice out into the
> > open.
> >
>
> There are not many FOSS engineers available to service FOSS based
> computers. It brings to my mind a question for all:-
>
> How much does a FOSS service provider charge to install GNU/Linux on a
> computer? What would be the annual maintenance cost per year per FOSS
> based system? Any average figures?
>
> Another problem is that FOSS is ready for the people, but people are not
> ready for FOSS. Both users as well as programmers/developers. A guy
> working for one of the biggest software companies in India told me that
> FOSS programmers are few and too expensive. Windows based pros are
> available in lots. Software giants that make banking software use things
> like dot net for banking solutions. How can such software be expected to
> run on FOSS? Everyone is looking at the economical side of hiring
> cheaper programmers who are available by the dozen.
>
>
> > 2.  Build up an effort to force Microsoft to let its boot loader
> > recognize and (hopefully) accommodate other operating systems that
> > have been installed previously.  This would at least keep them intact
> > instead of being overwritten / rendered unusable when the user
> > inevitably installs Windows, licensed or unlicensed, thus keeping up
> > the possibility that it will get used sometimes, even out of
> > curiosity.
> >
> >
> >
> This need not be a major issue if a handy CD is made available that a
> user simply pops in and restores the GRUB boot loader by simply clicking
> Yes in a dialog box.
>
> --
> Regards,
>
> Rony.
>
> GNU/Linux !
> No Viruses
> No Spyware
> Only Freedom.
>
> --
> http://mm.glug-bom.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxers
>
-- 
http://mm.glug-bom.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxers

Reply via email to