Arun Khan wrote: > The above philosophy may work for a desktop setup in a "closed" LAN. > > For a server visible on the 'Net this is not an option. If it is > running a service that needs to be patched with a security fix - it > needs to be patched. Otherwise face the consequences of a compromised > box. > > As for using Ubuntu on a server, I concur with other posts. Ditto for > the "community" versions sponsored by the commercial linux distros. > > True !
-- Regards, Rony. GNU/Linux ! No Viruses No Spyware Only Freedom. -- http://mm.glug-bom.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxers
