Ravindra Jaju <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On Fri, May 30, 2008 at 2:06 PM, Arun Khan wrote: > I think it is a case of incomplete proof reading. > > I have read the article and saw Dr. Phatak's name spelt correctly in 2 > places, only in the last instance did I notice the error. > > It happens. Have we not all, at one time or another, sent out emails > w/o checking for spelling errors?
Not entirely correct. I first checked and saw this error at all places. Sometime later, I saw the first instance corrected but the next two were wrong. And now - you seem to have seen another revision! At another times, I saw another article on rediff about another professor at IITB, again with a spelling mistake! This isn't simply an informal email. This is an important article on a well-visited website - and on the 'front page'! It's shows how reliable these reports (and reporters) are. In any case, the bias on various news websites/papers/channels is obvious to people who have even some knowledge of the topic in focus. For everyone else - well, they are simply misled my the media on many topics! It's all about sensationalism and eye-ball catching. Best wishes, jaju -- http://mm.glug-bom.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxer There is a cover story in LINUX For You magazine this month that exposes Microsoft's claims. The story has clearly showed that OOXML is NOT open standard, that its not even ISO standard and as of today iso-approved OOXML doesn't even exist. So, who is MS fooling? Arnie --------------------------------- Explore your hobbies and interests. Click here to begin. -- http://mm.glug-bom.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxers
