On Wednesday 06 Aug 2008 15:03, Saurabh Nanda wrote: > JTD, > > I'm extremely sorry, but I still don't fully understand your > argument. I understand that you're against the clauses given in > section 4.11.6 ([...]The claim orienting towards a "process/method" > should contain a hardware or machine limitation.[...]), but your > point does not "jump out" from what you've written. > > You should probably try a different approach in articulating > yourself.
The definition of general purpose and special purpose hardware is very blury. Arguments can be turned around to bolster the need for software patents, if not formulated carefully. > > Anyways, are you coming to Antop Hill for the stakeholder meeting > tomorrow? > > Saurabh. > -- > http://nandz.blogspot.com > http://foodieforlife.blogspot.com -- Rgds JTD -- http://mm.glug-bom.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxers
