On 11-Aug-08, at 11:15 PM, Rony wrote: > jtd wrote: >> >> Having stated the above, IMO there is no new vulnerability caused by >> merely using wireless. One can tap into a wire with equal ease, save >> the headache of relative physical proximity. >> >> >> > In the recent case, there could be no 'hacking' involved at all. > The guy > must have simply used a network available openly. There are many > places > where wireless security is not enabled. The owner does not realize > that > his private network has turned into a 'sarvajanik internet utsav' till > he receives his inflated bill.
this is easily solved by using an unbreakable password like 'root123' -- regards Kenneth Gonsalves Associate, NRC-FOSS [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://nrcfosshelpline.in/code/ -- http://mm.glug-bom.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxers
