On Tue, Dec 23, 2008 at 1:53 AM, jtd <j...@mtnl.net.in> wrote: > ???. Samba /CIFS works better than M$ network share. However you
Ooh my boat is t3h bigger than you're boat. I rock. You suck. Right? :) Explain how exactly is SAMBA/CIFS better than a M$ share. And how EXACTLY is a SAMBA / CIFS share different from a M$ Network share. Could you put in some performance numbers as well? ( If SAMBA / CIFS is actually different from M$ network share i.e. ) > really dont need samba if u are using linux. NFS works very well. Again the case of my boat is bigger than your boat :) > the last proprietory bit. There are many FOSS alternatives with > mostly far superior features, but required learning new UIs and ooh...and the names of these alternatives are... ? ? ? -- Regards, Dinesh A. Joshi -- http://mm.glug-bom.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxers
