On Wed, 27 Feb 2002 19:31:33 +0530
"Navin Dhanuka" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> > Obviously proprietary software can generate more money than free
> > software. No one is disputing that.  The question you need to think
> > about is whether proprietary software is good for Indian society and
> > good for global society.
> > If money is our only measure then we should willing donate our
> > organs for for cash, no?
> 
> Tell me if a company like Peutronics, make there flagship software
> Tally OpenSource or Free,
> are they to gain more or lose more.
[hmmm...]
Tally sucks! there is a Acc software that out there think at SF that is 
lice. under GNU/GPL

> 
> Gain in terms of ofcourse MONEY.
> Lose in terms of __ ___ __ everything.
> 
> === === ===
> 
> GPL is taking court action
> against a violator. The FSF is taking legal action against
> "Progress Software Corp." who attempted to ship a binary of
> "Gemini" -- a mysql storage module without providing sources.
> Progress Software sells a CDROM called NuSphere MySQL Advantage.
> This contains various applications like Apache, PHP and MySQL.
> 
> As a very important part of HA database services and crash
> recovery, Gemini is very popular. But the source code is under
> wraps . ie A GPL violation by Progress Software.
> 
> The question is not about GPL standing for trial, but the
> point about MySQL AB selling ``dual licensed'' editions and
> Progress Software not being allowed. IMHO GPL will win !
> 
> [-SNIP-]
>   EBEN MOGLEN's Affidavit :
> 
>   19-a.. Redistribution must itself occur under GPL and only GPL,
> with no additional license conditions. (See Exhibit B, �2(b));
>   19-b.. Redistribution must include ``source code,'' the
> human-readable form of computer programs that allows programmers
> to understand and modify computer programs for themselves, as
> opposed to ``object code,'' which is the ``machine language''
> version of computer programs that is very difficult for programmers
> to understand or modify
> 
>  19-c.. Redistribution must include a copy of the GPL, so that
> users are aware of their rights to use, copy, modify and distribute,
> and so that anyone engaged in redistribution is also aware of the
> conditions under which redistribution is permitted.
> ......
>   35.. I then checked whether the source code of the Gemini
>  component of mysqld was available. I saw that it was not.
>  I used standard tools to ``recompile'' mysqld, which means
>  to rebuild the program from the parts provided, and discovered
>  that the rebuilt mysqld did not include Gemini capacity. In
>  a manual distributed in the portion of the CD only related to
>  Windows users I found the statement that ```GEMINI' tables
>  will be included in some future MySQL 3.23.X source distribution.''
>  ......
> 
>   38.. Under GPL �4, I conclude, Progress Software Corp. lost the
>  right to distribute MySQL when it distributed NuSphere MySQL
>  Advantage in a fashion that violated GPL.
> [-END-SNIP-]
> 
> ==== ==== ====
> And if Neuspehere  has developed cool stuff, has bore expenses for
> R&D. How should it make money.
> 
> N.D.
> ==== ==== ====
> 
> 
> _________________________________________________________
> Do You Yahoo!?
> Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com
> 
> _______________________________________________
> http://mm.ilug-bom.org.in/mailman/listinfo/linuxers


Warren Brian Noronha
Consultant on GNU Based Systems
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.wbn.f2s.com
_______________________________________________
http://mm.ilug-bom.org.in/mailman/listinfo/linuxers

Reply via email to