On Tuesday 03 June 2003 19:55, Amit Upadhyay wrote:

> > All the same it makes me wonder why chinese is first supported as
> > international language these days by any software. Devnagri
> > doesn't figure
>
> May be coz they know kungfu better than us ;) [my guess is Chinese
> language is not as complicated as Indic ones from rendering/input
> point of view]

It is a lot more complicated.

>
> > anywhere most of the times. Despite the fact that mandarin script
> > is quite difficult in structure than the devnagri. Some developer
> > of X back then pointed out that it was due to lack of standard in
> > implementation of fonts.

Only partly true. The real reason is market size all of the 1.2 
billion of em (well almost all) read and write the same.



-- 
http://mm.ilug-bom.org.in/mailman/listinfo/linuxers

Reply via email to