Sometime Today, BIJU KRISHNAN assembled some asciibets to say: > ---->DLL--->EXE (RAM)---->Compiled but no check for > size of compiled output. > > In GNU/Linux OS > > ---->object/.so----->binary/daemon(RAM)---->Compiled > and checked for size of compiled o/p.
It isn't clear what point you're trying to make here. > And as for shell scripts, and rpm's which we blindly > execute sometimes........pls do a md5 verification to > check for trusted signatures........ most shell scripts do not have md5 signatures attached. Even if they do, how will you verify that the signature has not been altered? > community is so alert that you'll definitely know abt it before the > hacker knows it......... if the hacker doesn't find out, then how will he fix it? I personally hope that the hacker is the first person to find out so that he can fix the bug before any one else finds it. Philip -- "All language designers are arrogant. Goes with the territory..." (By Larry Wall) -- http://mm.ilug-bom.org.in/mailman/listinfo/linuxers
