On Friday 03 December 2004 08:40, Srinivasan Krishnan wrote: > On Thu, 2004-12-02 at 06:28, risqer wrote: > > Hi, > > Is Qt free now, I mean"free as in speech" ?
> > Dual licenced - GPL/QPL (QT Public licence, akin to the GPL) for > GPL'd apps, and commercial seat based licencing for commercial wrong terminology. U presume that GPL'd software are not commercial.GPLd applications can be very commercial. The right terminology would be "non GPL'd". This isn't the first time that an incorrect / misleading statement about GPL / commercial software has appeared on the list. Please take care not to mislead. > apps. Check their website for details. >From one of their PRs "As before, any user who wishes to create proprietary or closed source software must first purchase a development license from Trolltech." rgds jtd -- http://mm.ilug-bom.org.in/mailman/listinfo/linuxers
