On Mon, 04 Apr 2005 Rony Bill wrote :
>Abhishek Daga wrote:
>
>>To be able to use linux successfully as a desktop for non power users, these 
>>are
>>the barriers I faced. 
>>a) Plug n play for devices such as USB Web cam, USB Hub, USB Card Reader.
>>b) Internal Modem Dlink 560i+++ installation woes and lack of a versatile 
>>dialer
>>to just click n connect for non root users.
>>c) Winmodem detection and configuration woes.
>>
>>The question is:
>>Which linux distribution can I use which will act as an effective desktop for
>>home users which will overcome atleast most of the difficulties faced above.  
>I am in the same boat too, looking for a viable linux alternative for my 
>clients. I have used RedHat 8 (in my old pc), Xandros Personal, RedHatEL WS, 
>EduMorphix, SuSe Server (was an older version, so no GUI compatibility) and 
>PCQ Linux 2005 on my P4.
>The only distro that detected my internal DLink modem was Xandros Personal. 
>This distro is the closest to Windows in looks and ease of use and even the 
>webbsite advertises it as its USP.
>
>http://www.xandros.com/
>
>Regards,
>
>Rony.

Another important aspect which I have experienced is that all these desktops 
require powerfull PCs. I could very easily run Win SE/Me on a 
Celeron 333 MHz, with 64Megs of RAM, but could not run any of the linux 
desktops on this config.
I believe KDE & GNOME are heavy. Some lighter X-managers like XFCE are good, 
but one loses the extensive menus etc.

Pls correct me if I am wrong or I have missed any aspect.

I too am looking for a good desktop which would run smoothly on a Celeron 333 / 
P-II 220 / AMD K6 433 type PCs with good gui menus & functionality.

I believe CDWriter, Sound, Web camera & Modem are all that a regular PC  user 
at home and office would require.

Thx.
Vai


--
http://mm.ilug-bom.org.in/mailman/listinfo/linuxers

Reply via email to