This is currently only qmail on AMD64 with > 4GB of virtual memory, but people should upgrade anyway.
Devdas Bhagat ----- Forwarded message from Georgi Guninski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ----- From: "Georgi Guninski" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Tue, 31 May 2005 07:00:22 -0400 To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cc: [email protected], [email protected] Subject: [Full-disclosure] Re: qmail security guarantee questioned X-Mailer: Microsoft CDO for Exchange 2000 User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6i On Thu, May 26, 2005 at 12:35:48PM +0100, Justin Murdock wrote: > you have yet to demonstrate that this bug will allow the system to be > compromised - you'll be able to save a file in /var/qmail/queue, then > exec it, or a system binary - but you'll still be stuck with very poor > privileges. the program at: http://www.guninski.com/where_do_you_want_billg_to_go_today_4.html#qpopup executes code with root privileges via qmail-popup for me. the same commands zero writing bug. notes for the qmail fanatics: - this is not a dos, this is remote code execution with root privileges - with local access the offsets are easily found, so exploitation is very reliable in this case - djb gives installation instructions in INSTALL which allow root compromise - the payload consists of "int3" which produces trace trap for the microsoft certified solitaire experts (MCSEs) who can't get it -- where do you want bill gates to go today? _______________________________________________ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/ ----- End forwarded message ----- -- http://mm.ilug-bom.org.in/mailman/listinfo/linuxers
