On 25/08/05 01:22 -0700, Trevor Warren wrote: > > > --- Devdas Bhagat <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I apologise if I appeared rude, there was no > > intention to be. > > The rules above are common protocol design rules, > > and should be > > followed. > [snip] > > Devdas, do remember at times it would be worth > building the reliability for UDP since research shows > that the reliability of TCP on WAN's can cause > deadlocks-delays-inefficiency. > And why would _your_ reliability implementation not face the same issues?
> To reach a decision on which protocol to make use of > completely depends on the implementation one is Actually, it depends on the requirement. Implementation is a detail. > looking for. Just taking the basic tenets of TCP-UDP > and building from there is a sure disaster....atleast > for the implementation we are looking at. > There are tradeoffs to every decision. Feel free to reinvent the wheel :). Devdas Bhagat -- http://mm.ilug-bom.org.in/mailman/listinfo/linuxers
