On 10/26/05, Devdas Bhagat <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On 26/10/05 19:39 +0530, Chetan S wrote: > > yup. While it qualifies as spam itself I would say that the news > reported > > are good. > > > Spam is about consent, not content. > > Devdas Bhagat > > right. The contents are good the consent was absent hence qualifies as spam.
C -- http://mm.ilug-bom.org.in/mailman/listinfo/linuxers
