List

On Sat, Jan 10, 2009 at 11:41 PM, Raj Mathur <[email protected]> wrote:

> I haven't yet seen a resolution to the question of what licence mails to
> a mailing list are subject to yet (remember having this discussion as
> far back as 1996 or so), but IMO each individual contributor mailing
> under a licence of his/her choice is unacceptable.  What if one person
> selects the GFDL for her mails, another CC-BY, another CC-SA, another
> CC-NC, and a few more select a few more licences?  It will be
> impossible to do anything with the list archives... heck, even backing
> up your private copy of the archives may become illegal.
>
> There should be a blanket licence for all postings to the list, and if
> an individual contributor doesn't like that s/he is welcome to not post
> to the list at all.  List admins?


OK... This looks like a nice argument against licensing individual mails to
list..

Let us debate it a little more and we will make necessary changes in the
list guidelines.


> Regards,
>
> -- Raju
>
>
With regards,
-- 
--Dinesh Shah :-)
Shah Micro System
+91-98213-11906
Blog-1: http://dineshah.wordpress.com/
Blog-2: http://dineshah.blogspot.com/
Steve Martin  - "I like a woman with a head on her shoulders. I hate necks."
-- 
http://mm.glug-bom.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxers
  • [ILUG... shirish
    • ... Kartik Mistry
      • ... shirish
        • ... Kenneth Gonsalves
          • ... shirish
            • ... Kartik Mistry
            • ... Kenneth Gonsalves
              • ... shirish
                • ... Raj Mathur
                • ... Dinesh Shah (દિન ેશ શાહ/द िनेश शाह)
                • ... Mehul Ved
                • ... Kenneth Gonsalves
                • ... Prashant Verma
                • ... Philip Tellis
                • ... Rony
                • ... Atanu Datta
                • ... Raj Mathur
                • ... Saswata Banerjee
                • ... Kenneth Gonsalves
                • ... jtd

Reply via email to