On Fri, Mar 20, 2009 at 11:40 AM, Dinesh A. Joshi
<[email protected]> wrote:
>> When everybody elses hardware works and yours doesnt, It means flaky
>> hardware.
>>

Yes, you will probably have a clue about how this works when you get
into how exactly some hardware work (or don't). Recently I came across
an issue where a certain DVD drive lies about the type of disk it has
and we had to hack in a fix for it. That in my opinion is flaky
hardware, not a driver issue per say.

Why do such hacks take time to come into Debian sid? I suspect its
because of their QA process, which is quite exhaustive. If you want
such bleeding edge support then try experimental -- it'll be just
about as stable as a Fedora.

> ROTFLMAO... The sheer *arrogance* disgusts me :) Search for Jmicron,
> Debian, Intel DG 965 RY motherboard.
>
>> You were glorifying BSD with one piece of logic while pulling down
>> sarge with the same. And I was talking SPECIFICALLY about stability.
>>
> Thats what you were doing in the first place. And as I said, Stability
> is a relative term.
>

No. Stability implies less susceptibility to crashes/downtime. What
you're talking about is compatibility. Get your terminology right.


-- 
Siddhesh Poyarekar
http://siddhesh.in
-- 
http://mm.glug-bom.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxers

Reply via email to