On Monday 23 March 2009 13:55:36 jtd wrote:
> > here we go - I am on record in saying that one of the biggest
> > stumbling blocks to the adoption of FOSS in this country is that
> > the FOSS movement here is largely controlled by IT professionals.
>
> Who else do you think should be in "control"? And isnt this true
> everywhere?.

the word 'control' is wrong - 'the majority of FOSS community are IT 
professionals' is better. Elsewhere there are also a huge number of people who 
are non-IT professionals who contribute. I remember being on the mailing list 
of a open source accounting system - 90% of the users and contributors were 
accountants! Or the developers of GNUmed - most of them are practicing 
doctors. This is not happening in India. Doctors, lawyers, accountants, 
merchants, librarians and large numbers of others are just not into software 
development, even at the end user level. A FOSS alternative to tally will only 
emerge when some accountant starts developing software - the IT professional 
does not see the need.

>
> > Most of these guys are terrified of losing their jobs if all
> > software was made free.
>
> That still does not explain why the babu has to decide against FOSS.

the babu consults the professional
>
> Your point is that
> 1) The IT professional does not advise the government correctly

not exactly - any foss projects starts when someone scratches an itch - the 
reason why very little application software emerges in Indian space is that 
not enough non-IT people are doing this, and the IT professionals do not have 
this type of itch.

> 2) FOSS movement should not be in control of IT pros

not exactly - I cannot prescribe what should and should not be. I can only say 
that it is when non-IT pros in big numbers start developing that the movement 
will make real headway.

> 3) Corruption is partly responsible for FOSS non adoption

yes
>
> To which i add
> 4) The few babus who half heartedly venture always hit the
> compatibility with M$ roadblock
> 5) Tender norms are heavily loaded against FOSS
> 6) Non visibility (as opposed to availability) of support at ground
> level at time T0
> 7) Utter lack of understanding of the FOSS biz model at all levels.

agreed

-- 
regards
Kenneth Gonsalves
Associate
NRC-FOSS
http://nrcfosshelpline.in/web/
-- 
http://mm.glug-bom.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxers

Reply via email to