On Mon, Mar 30, 2009 at 9:44 PM, scrapo <[email protected]> wrote: > Dinesh A. Joshi wrote: >> Information Security wrote: >> >>> it seems to be good option but really expensive compared to people who >>> would go on downloading there mails as i think 10gb fair usage policy >>> cap is just not good it should be more than 25 gb per month >>> >>> >> 250 - 500GB cap seems to be fair. Not 25 or 10GB. ( per month ) >> >> - Dinesh >> > Actually, I find it funny that you guys are ok with a "fair use cap" > which in effect makes it a 10gb data limit connection while being called > an unlimited connection. What it amounts to is false advertising. > MTNL is much better, it does not call it an unlimited plan but says its > a limited data plan. > On the same front, i have consulted a lawyer, and according to him, it amounts to unfair trade practice, via false advertising. they can be take up in the consumer court and will have their knuckles rapped.
Now the question is, who is the brave soul who can take both tata and reliance into court and survive..... > Regards > saswata > -- > http://mm.glug-bom.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxers > -- http://mm.glug-bom.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxers
