He has said, "please have a look" and "give reviews" - nothing implicit about it. I would say that that was a pretty explicit invitation. Sanjay
On 1 July 2010 18:45, Saswata Banerjee & Associates < [email protected]> wrote: > > On 01-Jul-2010, at 3:21 PM, Kenneth Gonsalves wrote: > > > On Thursday 01 July 2010 15:14:03 narendra sisodiya wrote: > >>> Sorry, I totally forgot to add license information. > >> > >> Does it mean the current version is under public domain ? > >> > >> As per my knowledge, if you forget to add license information then the > work > >> goes to public domain. > >> > > > > no - according to Indian law, one has to explicitly throw the work into > public > > domain. At present he has the copyright to the application, and since he > has > > not licensed it and given permission for people to download, use and > modify > > it, anyone doing so is breaking the law. > > Nopes, since he has put the details of it on a public mailing list that is > searchable on google, etc, he has implicitly given permission to download > and use it, not ofcourse to modify it. He still owns the copyright to the > code. > > > -- > > Regards > > Kenneth Gonsalves > > Senior Associate > > NRC-FOSS at AU-KBC > > -- > > http://mm.glug-bom.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxers > > -- > http://mm.glug-bom.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxers > -- http://mm.glug-bom.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxers
