Binand Sethumadhavan wrote:
> 2010/10/31 jtd <[email protected]>:
>   
>> Hmm poor understanding of English semantics (amongst other things).
>> The word Windows software with a capital W in the middle of a
>> sentence means it is name of a specific thing. There is only ONE os
>> product family by that name Microsoft Windows. If he were referring
>> to a windowing system, he would state "window" - no "W" at the start
>> no "s" in the end. So your excuse - or logic - either way fails.
>>     
>
> Are you seriously suggesting that when Dr. Saraswat "told reporters on
> the sidelines of a function", he actually said, "Windows software -
> that's with a capital W, and an s at the end" - and it is not the
> reporter doing the capitalization etc. himself? Really!
>
> Personally, I don't believe DRDO will do something as foolhardy as
> develop this "OS" based on Microsoft Windows. They have a track record
> of using Linux, and most likely that's what they'll do in this case
> too.
>
>   
>>>> That is what the PR is supposed to tell us - what organisations
>>>> are thinking and planning to do. Throw crappy PR up and it all
>>>> comes raining down.
>>>>         
>>> Quite. GoI's multiple PR snafus are all there to be seen.
>>>       
>> Not quite in this case. YOUR link seems to have got things rubbished.
>> The TOI link is quite ok technically.
>>     
>
> The TOI link was a report from Russia. Doesn't redeem GoI in any way.
>
>   
>> many academicians and FOSS proponents. Mere APIs are sufficient in
>> any world including one as warped up as M$ and indeed, every software
>> development continues happily without any source from M$
>>     
>
> Well, I did post a link in which Microsoft offers access to its source
> code to developers. I'd imagine many non-trivial software makers would
> be taking advantage of this offer too (Symantec and other AV software
> makers immediately come to mind, plus a friend of mine in HP did have
> access to Microsoft source code).
>
> Binand
>   
Why not ask Dr S. to clarify his  (or is it a 'her'?) statement to the 
ILUG  so that we all know the 'truth' instead of second guessing?

regards
hg
-- 
http://mm.glug-bom.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxers

Reply via email to