It would have been a good incentive to pay Zimbra team and get their paid version rather the movin back to exchange, still it would have been cheaper.
I personally think that moving back to exchange had a fundamental thought process problem then with features, if main product is free its expected to get everything possible free of cost. Regards, Mitul Limbani Enterux Solutions www.enterux.com Kenneth Gonsalves <[email protected]> wrote: >On Mon, 2011-01-03 at 17:37 +0530, Kenneth Gonsalves wrote: >> > Could you give a few examples? The ones I have used have >> full-featured >> > open-source editions. >> >> zimbra > >actually a pretty large industrial group in Coimbatore migrated to >zimbra 'community edition' - in one month they migrated back to >Microsoft exchange. Reason - 1. grindingly slow, and more important 2. >very rudimentary search features. These problems are not there in the >editions developed in the closet. There are hundreds of these bogus open >source apps around. Although there are quite a few where there is a >single edition - the paid for plans offer support and customisation, but >the code is the same. > >-- >regards >KG >http://lawgon.livejournal.com >Coimbatore LUG rox >http://ilugcbe.techstud.org/ > >-- >http://mm.glug-bom.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxers -- http://mm.glug-bom.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxers
