On Tue, 2011-01-04 at 14:51 +0530, jtd wrote: > When did I dodge? Afair you never specifically asked me.
for the past 7 years every time this debate (GPL vs BSD) comes up I raise the question of postgresql, python and apache when you predict doom for all non-GPL projects > > > > > please read the last paragraph: > > > > http://www.postgresql.org/about/licence.html > > This is as liberal as it gets. Where is the problem. > Except the "without fees" wording. Which is not much of a > restriction. > You can charge for the contents of the database that you will be > creating. You can even make a binary only distro, which is not to my > liking, but then if someone does not want to share his code, who > cares. > In line with most other open licences, you may be open to patent > attacks. are there any licenses that make one not open to patent attacks? -- regards KG http://lawgon.livejournal.com Coimbatore LUG rox http://ilugcbe.techstud.org/ -- http://mm.glug-bom.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxers
