On Monday 28 November 2011 00:10:24 Dinesh Shah wrote: > On Sun, Nov 27, 2011 at 11:37 PM, Binand Sethumadhavan <[email protected]> wrote: > > On 27 November 2011 22:50, Dinesh Shah (દિનેશ શાહ/दिनेश शाह) > > > > <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Will you allow me to open a bank account in your name and do any kind > >> of transactions in that account? > >> > >> So is it OK to buy a cell phone in your name make obscene calls to > >> these cute girls in my neighbourhood? :-) > > > > These two are warped arguments used by our security agencies to hide > > their lax investigation techniques. > > Really? > > > Don't you lend your phones to > > family/friends to make calls? > > I do to my FAMILY and FRIENDS not any Tom, Dick or Harry who I do not > know (I can not ID him/her) > > > A name is not something anyone owns. Why > > is it impossible for two Dinesh Shahs to exist in the same locality > > banking at the same bank? > > Exactly! Without positive identity linking me to my account, how bank > is going to be sure the person withdrawing money from my account is > not that other Dinesh Shah? :-) > > (BTW, Signature is a biometric ID,even though it can be spoofed or > duplicated)
LOL. Wrong. It is not. You were not born with a signature nor did your genes and or nature form your signature. Biometrics refers specifically to measurement of biological characteristics inherent in living creatures, in our case humans. -- http://mm.ilug-bom.org.in/mailman/listinfo/linuxers
