On 17/12/2025 05:14, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Mon, 15 Dec 2025 15:03:23 +0000 Kevin Brodsky <[email protected]>
> wrote:
>
>> Add basic KUnit tests for the generic aspects of the lazy MMU mode:
>> ensure that it appears active when it should, depending on how
>> enable/disable and pause/resume pairs are nested.
> I needed this for powerpc allmodconfig;
>
> --- a/arch/powerpc/mm/book3s64/hash_tlb.c~mm-add-basic-tests-for-lazy_mmu-fix
> +++ a/arch/powerpc/mm/book3s64/hash_tlb.c
> @@ -30,6 +30,7 @@
> #include <trace/events/thp.h>
>
> DEFINE_PER_CPU(struct ppc64_tlb_batch, ppc64_tlb_batch);
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(ppc64_tlb_batch);
>
> /*
> * A linux PTE was changed and the corresponding hash table entry
> @@ -154,6 +155,7 @@ void __flush_tlb_pending(struct ppc64_tl
> flush_hash_range(i, local);
> batch->index = 0;
> }
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(__flush_tlb_pending);
>
> void hash__tlb_flush(struct mmu_gather *tlb)
> {
> _
Oh indeed I hadn't considered that arch_{enter,leave}_lazy_mmu_mode()
refer to those symbols on powerpc... Maybe a bit overkill to export
those just for a test module, but I'm not sure there's a good
alternative. Forcing LAZY_MMU_MODE_KUNIT_TEST=y is ugly as it would also
force KUNIT=y. Alternatively we could depend on !PPC, not pretty either.
- Kevin
