On Thu, 2007-10-04 at 05:56 -0500, Josh Boyer wrote: > On Wed, 2007-10-03 at 22:50 -0600, Grant Likely wrote: > > From: Grant Likely <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > > dcr.c is an arch/powerpc only thing. > > > > Signed-off-by: Grant Likely <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > --- > > > > Ben/Paulus, > > > > As far as I can tell this is correct. Having sysdev/dcr.c in the arch/ppc > > build spits out warnings. Grep doesn't show anything in arch/ppc that > > is using it. > > Sorry, no. The ibm_emac driver uses it, which is arch/ppc. (Yes, the > old one.) > > If there are warnings, let's fix those up. Perhaps Michael's recent > patches in that area introduced something.
Hmm, I picked a good time to be away :) I think it's OK. ibm_emac uses dcr_write() but it should always be using the native one from dcr-native.h. So I think this patch is good. Just another reason to get rid of arch/ppc :D cheers -- Michael Ellerman OzLabs, IBM Australia Development Lab wwweb: http://michael.ellerman.id.au phone: +61 2 6212 1183 (tie line 70 21183) We do not inherit the earth from our ancestors, we borrow it from our children. - S.M.A.R.T Person
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
_______________________________________________ Linuxppc-dev mailing list Linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org https://ozlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxppc-dev
