On Mon, Oct 22, 2007 at 07:36:57AM -0500, Jon Loeliger wrote:
> So, like, the other day Segher Boessenkool mumbled:
> > > Property names have been limited to start with
> > > characters from the set [a-zA-Z,._#?]. That is, the
> > > digits and the expression symbols have been removed.
> >
> > This cannot work; many property names start with a digit,
> > for example.
>
> Are any of those property names in use in any
> of our DTS files or b-w-o.txt? Not really, no.
> In fact, with this lexical change, all of our
> DTS files still produce byte-identical results.
>
> I really think this is one of those areas where
> we may need to stray from the other guideline.
>
> Is there a compelling reason somewhere? Really?
We may have deprecated te '64-bit' and '32-64-bridge' properties in
cpu nodes for the flattened tree, but it already exists in a great
number of Apple and IBM trees. It would be poor form for dtc to choke
on these trees.
--
David Gibson | I'll have my music baroque, and my code
david AT gibson.dropbear.id.au | minimalist, thank you. NOT _the_ _other_
| _way_ _around_!
http://www.ozlabs.org/~dgibson
_______________________________________________
Linuxppc-dev mailing list
Linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org
https://ozlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxppc-dev
