On Wed, 31 Oct 2007 15:21:13 +0300 Valentine Barshak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Josh Boyer wrote: > > On Tue, 30 Oct 2007 19:45:11 +0300 > > Valentine Barshak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > >> The following patches add PowerPC 440GRx Rainier board support. > >> The board is almost identical to Sequoia, but doesn't have USB > >> and FPU is not supported. > > > > So why do we need anything other than the DTS and the defconfig? I > > would think the sequoia wrapper and platform files would suffice > > completely for this. > > Yes, they would, but how to handle the board name in this case? > I mean the resulting image would be cuImage.sequoia for rainier and the > DTS board name has to be sequoia for rainier too. > I don't now, may be it's not a big deal to call rainier a sequoia though. > What do you think? Let me think about this for a bit. Theoretically, there should be a way to have a common code base between these two boards and have the images use the right names. josh _______________________________________________ Linuxppc-dev mailing list Linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org https://ozlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxppc-dev