> This patch provides a way for an architecture to provide its > own walk_memory_resource()
It seems that the patch description "walk_memory_remove()" is wrong? johannes
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
_______________________________________________ Linuxppc-dev mailing list Linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org https://ozlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxppc-dev
