On Fri, 2007-11-16 at 08:58 -0600, Josh Boyer wrote: > > 2) Please just move the machine check handlers out to individual > ones > > instead of using the generic one. That way you don't need runtime > checks > > between the two (they don't seem to share much of it as-is anyway). > > Anton pinged me about cleaning that up a couple months ago. I have a > half-baked patch for it somewhere, but I agree having 4xx set a ppc_md > specific handler would be a good idea.
No need. The 2 asm implementation can branch to 2 different C functions and the IVOR will be set to the right one. Ben. _______________________________________________ Linuxppc-dev mailing list Linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org https://ozlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxppc-dev
