On Wed, 21 Nov 2007 14:08:46 +1100 Paul Mackerras <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > +#ifdef CONFIG_PPC64
Use CONFIG_COMPAT?
> +struct indirect_registers32 {
> + unsigned int syscall_nr;
> + unsigned int args[6];
These could (should?) be compat_ulong_t
> +++ b/include/asm-powerpc/systbl.h
> @@ -313,3 +313,4 @@ COMPAT_SYS_SPU(timerfd)
> SYSCALL_SPU(eventfd)
> COMPAT_SYS_SPU(sync_file_range2)
> COMPAT_SYS(fallocate)
> +COMPAT_SYS(indirect)
Do the SPUs want this?
--
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.canb.auug.org.au/~sfr/
pgpPEUUEvOGRF.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ Linuxppc-dev mailing list [email protected] https://ozlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxppc-dev
