[Olof Johansson - Thu, Nov 22, 2007 at 09:20:29AM -0600]
| On Wed, Nov 21, 2007 at 01:58:06PM +0300, Cyrill Gorcunov wrote:
| > On 11/21/07, Cyrill Gorcunov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
| > > This patch does fix missed increment on counter
| > >
| > > Signed-off-by: Cyrill Gorcunov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
| > > ---
| > > Sorry for that nonstandart patch submission - I've only access
| > > to gmail with Internet Explorer on my work. If that is not OK - will
resend
| > > the patch today evening with mutt.
| > >
| > >
| > Oops - it seems the patch is corrupted a bit. Drop it please - will
| > resend today evening. Sorry.
|
| Thanks for the fix, but please cc the maintainer (me) next time, as well
| as the arch list (linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org)?
|
| That loop could actually even easier be converted to a
| for_each_compatible_node() iteration. There's never more than one
| interface on the current boards but it's still nicer coding.
|
| Thanks,
|
| -Olof
|
Sorry Olof for missing you. Will cc you and a list next time.
I'm trying to convert all for(;;) cycles to for_each_.. macro
now (actually during the convertation I found a few potential NULL
pointer dereferences so they are going first to list as I've done on them).
So as only I have it done I'll send it to a list (and you too ;) Thanks.
Cyrill
_______________________________________________
Linuxppc-dev mailing list
Linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org
https://ozlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxppc-dev
