On 11/24/07, Robin H. Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Following up from initial conversation with benh in #ppc64, I did a bit
> of testing (and then a bit more).
>
> Two PCIe cards for my testing:
> a) sata_sil24 eSATA (x86 BIOS)
> b) ATI X700 graphics (x86 BIOS)
>
> I put the card into an amd64 box, found the relevant 'rom' node ($ROM) under
> /sys/device/pci*, and dumped it as follows:
> # echo 1>$ROM
> # cat $ROM >/tmp/dump
> # echo 0>$ROM
> On amd64, this produced the ROM for the cards fine (contained
> recognizable strings).
>
> I then repeated the same on my G5 (PM11,2), while the $ROM files have a
> non-zero size in sysfs (that corresponds to the size shown by lspci
> -vv), reading them always results in a 0-byte output.
>
> Is the PPC kernel broken? Does something in the PPC architecture forbid
> this? Instructions to muck with PCI code welcome.
The ROM is mapped in drivers/pci/rom.c
You could add some printks and see if there is an error and if the ROM
is accessible
rom = ioremap(start, *size);
if (!rom) {
/* restore enable if ioremap fails */
if (!(res->flags & (IORESOURCE_ROM_ENABLE |
IORESOURCE_ROM_SHADOW |
IORESOURCE_ROM_COPY)))
pci_disable_rom(pdev);
return NULL;
}
>
> This was under 2.6.24_rc3-git1, kernel .config available if needed.
>
> Why am I trying to access the PCI ROM? To make my newer X1900 card work
> under at least one of the newer (ati,radeonhd,avivo) drivers, that all
> try to access the ATI AtomBIOS for varying data.
>
> --
> Robin Hugh Johnson
> Gentoo Linux Developer & Infra Guy
> E-Mail : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> GnuPG FP : 11AC BA4F 4778 E3F6 E4ED F38E B27B 944E 3488 4E85
>
> _______________________________________________
> Linuxppc-dev mailing list
> Linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org
> https://ozlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxppc-dev
>
>
--
Jon Smirl
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
_______________________________________________
Linuxppc-dev mailing list
Linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org
https://ozlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxppc-dev
