Arnd Bergmann wrote: > From a code clarity perspective, the interesting point is that dma_addr_t is > what comes back from the functions in dma-mapping.h. If you don't use them, > a physical address is phys_addr_t. > > You can argue that the QS is really a DMA device, but in that case you > should convert the driver to use the DMA mapping interfaces correctly, > which I would consider overkill.
Why is it overkill? -Scott _______________________________________________ Linuxppc-dev mailing list Linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org https://ozlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxppc-dev
