On Mon, 2007-12-10 at 11:59 -0600, Josh Boyer wrote: > > This breaks ARCH=ppc builds. Unfortunately, that tree shares the > cputable.[ch] files, but has it's own traps.c. Which means you get > lots of nice undefined references like below for example: > > arch/powerpc/kernel/built-in.o:(.init.data+0x44): undefined reference > to `machine_check_4xx' > arch/powerpc/kernel/built-in.o:(.init.data+0x8c): undefined reference > to `machine_check_4xx' > arch/powerpc/kernel/built-in.o:(.init.data+0xd4): undefined reference > to `machine_check_4xx' > > Because the cputable entries for the processors are setting > the .machine_check function and it's never built. > > I'm not sure which would be easier, making arch/ppc use traps.c from > arch/powerpc, or adding similar functionality there.
Split cputable.c ? I hate arch/ppc sharing files ... Or I could port the changes to arch/ppc. I don't want to use the same traps.c file. Sharing file is just a pain every time we do major changes. Ben. _______________________________________________ Linuxppc-dev mailing list Linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org https://ozlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxppc-dev
