On Wed, Mar 2, 2016 at 10:28 AM, Andreas Schwab <sch...@linux-m68k.org> wrote:
> Geert Uytterhoeven <ge...@linux-m68k.org> writes:
>
>>> +#else
>>> +#define generic_rtc_ops *(struct rtc_class_ops*)NULL
>>> +#endif
>>>
>>> static int __init generic_rtc_probe(struct platform_device *dev)
>>> {
>>> struct rtc_device *rtc;
>>> + const struct rtc_class_ops *ops;
>>> +
>>> + ops = dev_get_platdata(&dev->dev);
>>> + if (!ops)
>>> + ops = &generic_rtc_ops;
>>
>> I hope no compiler version treats "&*(struct rtc_class_ops*)NULL" as
>> undefined behavior?
>
> Yes, that is guaranteed, the operations cancel each other (6.5.3.2#3: If
> the operand is the result of a unary * operator, neither that operator
> nor the & operator is evaluated and the result is as if both were
> omitted).
Thanks for confirming.
Gr{oetje,eeting}s,
Geert
--
Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- ge...@linux-m68k.org
In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
-- Linus Torvalds
_______________________________________________
Linuxppc-dev mailing list
Linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org
https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/linuxppc-dev
